InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 1387
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/08/2009

Re: Donotunderstand post# 657381

Monday, 01/04/2021 4:16:08 PM

Monday, January 04, 2021 4:16:08 PM

Post# of 793294
The US government cannot own shares in a private company. That's why they get warrants, not shares. Warrants the US got for other companies were sold prior to exercise. It is not clear whether an "Exercise and Sell" trade would be legal since there may be a millisecond while the government owned the shares, but exercising and holding is clearly illegal.

The F&F warrants specifically allow the government to sell them - that's how they would do it. They would sell them for the current price of shares minus the exercise price which is basically zero. They might sell at a discount if they want to reward some potential buyer. They might even sell them to fannie and freddie for just the option price if they felt like it.

Sometimes selling warrants to the parent company is part of the recapitalization plan. The companies can then sell those shares on the open market to raise cash instead of doing a secondary IPO. They did that with AIG as I recall.

The government could BUY a company, but then they can't have any publicly traded shares. I think the gov't actually took ownership of Chrysler for a while.

there is no requirement to exercise and SELL the same time